The “from:user” search workaround for seeing a blocker’s tweets (while still logged in) has stopped working

Updated 11 July 2018: still seems to work OK on

There are a lot of people making misleading (and occasionally illegal) health claims on Twitter. When you challenge them they often block you. This has happened to me (and many other skeptic bloggers, scientists, healthcare professionals etc), and my early efforts at finding out how to monitor such accounts and tweets is a large part of why I now have this blog about how Twitter appears to work!

Of course being blocked has never stopped anyone from reading a blocker’s tweets as you can always just log out (or use a spare account, or an incognito window) to view anyone’s tweets, as long as the blocker’s account is public.

One disadvantage of being logged out, particularly if you use desktop Twitter, is that you can see only their broadcast tweets and not their ‘Tweets and replies‘ tab. To get around that the search string   »from:username«   had, until yesterday, been a simple workaround while logged in as the blocked account, on desktop or the official mobile app.

As of yesterday it no longer works while logged in as the blocked account – I don’t know if that’s a glitch or a permanent change to Twitter’s search function but for now it looks like your options for viewing tweets from someone who’s blocked you are as follows

  • Log out and use the  »from:username«  search style to view replies as well as broadcast tweets
  • As above in an incognito window (for Twitter searching purposes the two are logiclly the same)
  • Log into a spare account and you can either use the above search strategy or just visit their page (assuming they’ve not blocked your spare account)
  • Use – you can even log in (for the time being, it might change) – as of early July the page seems to be down but is still up
  • Try other non-official phone apps too…

You can also search  »to:username«  to see tweets sent to that account if you like.

To see the tweets of someone whom you’ve blocked is as it always was – visit their profile and click on the ‘View tweets’ button.

Searching for words and phrases on Twitter

Hashtags (they look like this: #word or #phrase, eg #Event2015) are the easiest things to search because they form clickable links (click on one and you’ll be taken to the search results page for that tag).

If you’re using a phone or tablet app you’ll probably see all of the hashtagged tweets with the most recent at the top but if you’re viewing on desktop Twitter you’ll probably be shown the Top tweets for that tag first, and you can click ‘Live‘ to see ALL of them.

Screen Shot 2015-07-18 at 00.54.36

To search for anything on a Twitter third party app you’ll likely have either a search box or a magnifying glass symbol which will bring this option up. For really detailed searches I recommend using the desktop Twitter version which has all the bells and whistles.

Basic search is at
Advanced search is at and the list of operators (eg how to modify your search best) are below.

Searching for a tweet sent by someone
Use the from:username format to find all tweets sent by someone about a particular topic. Here are all my tweets mentioning the river Thames: from:jobrodie thames

You can adapt the search string to find tweets sent from:username to:someoneelse keyword to find all tweets sent from one account to another on a particular topic.

Screen Shot 2015-07-18 at 13.13.23

Further reading
Searching for a link (URL, address) on Twitter

Sharing a tweet via its link will likely notify the user

Every tweet sent has its own web page with an address (URL) that will point to it. You can share this link in a tweet of your own, how the tweet appears will depend on what app or platform other readers are using.

On Echofon for iPhone the tweet will appear as your text plus a clickable link to the tweet but on desktop Twitter the system will convert the tweet’s link into a visible embedded tweet that shows up without having to click on the link or tweet to view it. I believe this is the same on Twitter for iPhone etc. It will also appear in the Notifications tab of the original tweet sender.

It’s important to be aware of this as people have previously used this technique to ‘sub-tweet’ (ie send a critical tweet about someone else’s tweet without that person being aware). Fortunately, or unfortunately, Twitter changed how such tweets were handled and this is now more easily discoverable. Previously they’d have had to search for tweets mentioning their username, eg by searching username or

Avoid this by… using to hide the tweet’s link, then it will not notify the tweet’s author.

• “Forensic” Twitter – getting evidence for use in court etc

           For anyone who wants to capture Twitter-related evidence [17 Aug 2019]

I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice (I am not qualified to give it). Be very careful about relying on this information – if I am wrong my advice might damage your case! – and always seek appropriate legal advice if you need it. Different localities will have their own laws and application of those laws. [Page updated 17 Aug 2019 29 Aug 2018]

See further reading at end.

This post is written for people who need to keep an eye on a particular set of tweets, or information on a website. An example might be where someone says something (on Twitter) that crosses a line and may need to result in intervention from Police, statutory bodies or some other legal body, or perhaps it may even end up in court. I have no idea what type of evidence would be required to satisfy a court but here are some suggestions for capturing tweets as evidence, and their limitations.

If you’ve been blocked you can still view and save tweets by logging out, using a third party app (like Echofon for iPhone or for desktop) or creating a spare account. You can’t reply to a blocker’s tweets but you can reply to other people’s replies to them, if you want your tweet in the thread.

Table of Contents
1. Capturing the tweets while they’re still available
• 1a. Screen capture / screenshot
• 1b. Freezepage
• 1c. Storify or embedding in a blog
• 1d. Capturing the tweets as they’re sent – email notifications or IFTTT
2. Capturing deleted tweets
3. What did they use to send the tweet?
4. Detect changes on another website, or new information being published
5. How many followers did X have at point Y?
6. Fake tweets – screenshots, deletions
7. Further reading

1. Capturing the tweets while they’re still available

In Monroe v Hopkins (see PDF in further reading) section 84 the Judge notes that any litigant (either party in a trial) needs to take responsibility for capturing any tweet-related evidence (“and the responsibility of a solicitor to take reasonable steps to ensure that the client appreciates this responsibility and performs it”). This may include capturing the tweet itself, responses to it, information about how many people have liked or RTed it. You could even plug the tweet’s URL into Facebook to see if anyone’s shared it there too (only the public posts will show up).

1a. Screen capture / screenshot
Have the tweet visible on the screen and take a screenshot. Methods for doing this depend on the device but see [Taking a screenshot] for some suggestions.

For a better picture use desktop Twitter (and include the https:// link that’s visible in the address bar). Most Twitter platforms, including desktop, will also show you who has favourited or RTed the tweet (which may be useful evidence in itself of the spread of the tweet) but you may need to note the accounts that have done this as it’s not necessarily obvious from the pictures (and they may subsequently change their picture). If you hover the mouse over their picture a pop-up of their profile will appear. You can also capture some of the replies to the tweet too.

Note that more people might reply to the tweet later (or favourite it, or RT it) so this process may need to be repeated periodically.

Advantages: captures the tweet as it is, even if later deleted
Limitations: because an image can be altered it may not be deemed strong enough evidence. However I think it would be a ‘not unreasonable supposition’ to believe that someone stating under oath that it is true might satisfy the courts, though see tweet below. You might be lucky and find that others have created a corroborating screenshot or other way of verifying the tweet too. See also Section 6 on faked screenshots.

1b. Freezepage
To capture a copy of the ‘page’ on which the tweet appears (you need to use the tweet’s own address – you can find its URL in the tweet’s timestamp. Make sure you remove the S from the httpS bit of the address [update 22 March – removing the S from https:// to make it http:// may no longer be necessary, but if it gives an error message try that first]. You can create an account, or not

1c. Storify or embedding in a blog
Storify no longer available, alternatives here “Alternatives to Storify”

A tweet, once embedded in a Storify story or blog, will remain visible there even once deleted. It will look slightly different (you won’t be able to favourite it or RT it) but it will remain there otherwise exactly as it was.

Storify embeds: Search for the name of the person, or words in the tweet, or if you have its address use the link search to pin it down and save it in your Storify. See [How to use Storify like a pro to collect tweets] for more info.

Blog embeds: Either use the embed tweet option (previously found in the three … dots but this has been replaced with a down arrow to the right of the tweet) or, for WordPress dot com blogs (as this one) you can just use the tweet’s address and it will autoembed.

1d. Capturing the tweets as they’re sent
Email notifications – Generally this is ON by default and you might have already switched it off (it can be a bit annoying). Twitter can send you an email notification when someone sends you a tweet (or when someone likes or retweets your tweet).

Check your email notification settings here

This is an imperfect solution. Note that Twitter won’t email you every notification and it will largely ignore new accounts or those that haven’t confirmed an email address (and  it may be these types of accounts that you need to collect tweets from). Twitter has also changed its notifications – it used to be the case that you’d get a full copy of the text of the tweet and that may no longer be the case. [More on Twitter’s email preferences]

In fact it is likely that Twitter will hide some tweets sent in your mentions (notifications tab) from new or unconfirmed accounts, or even tweets that show up in response to those. It may be worth searching for the tweets (using to:yourusername to search). You can search while logged out but you may get a more complete picture logging in with a spare account.

IFTTT – The free online tool IFTTT (If This, Then That) lets you capture a copy of a ‘corpus’ (“bunch”) of tweets eg all from a particular user or all containing a hashtag. You can have them emailed to you or you can have them collected in a Google Drive spreadsheet or Evernote file. You can even have the tweets rebroadcast to a spare account (though I recommend making it a private one otherwise it’s a bit annoying and spammy).

I’ve not written a blog post specifically about setting up IFTTT but the information can be gleaned from the second part of [Downloading your old Twitter faves, setting up IFTTT to capture new ones] and another post that might be useful on how to use IFTTT is [How to display Instagram pictures correctly in tweets using IFTTT].

With IFTTT you authorise it to access your own Twitter account (to let it interact with Twitter) then authorise another service (whatever you want to use to collect the tweets) eg Google Drive or something else. IFTTT calls the different services channels and the instructions to “if a tweet contains X send an email to Y” a recipe.

2. Capturing deleted tweets
While deleting a tweet removes it from Twitter’s public servers it is still potentially findable by users (in some cases you may need to get a court order to recover it from Twitter’s backup servers, assuming that is possible).

If you are looking for a tweet only a short while after its deletion (I’m not sure exactly how long but it’s a matter of hours and no guarantees) you may find it via Google’s cache (see tiny green arrow in picture below, flanked by orange arrows, that is the link to find a cached copy, if available – manage your expectations though, it’s not all that common to find them in this way but does happen). Note that tweets that have previously been embedded in a blog post or used in a Storify story will still remain even after the tweet is deleted. Other search engines have caches too and you can see an example here


Other things to try if you can’t find the tweet(s) are to see if others have retweeted the text of the tweet(s) [search for words you remember in the tweet] or a screenshot [in which case they may have included the original @handle of the person who deleted the tweet so try searching for to:handle].

If you’re the sort of person who knows what an API is then you might be able to do something on that front but alas this exceeds my knowledge.

3. What did they use to send the tweet?
All tweets used to have additional information below the tweet saying what software had been used to send the tweet but Twitter no longer adds this in. However many third party apps do. Echofon for iPhone and will tell you how a tweet was sent.

  • Sent via Twitter Web Client generally means the person was using a web browser to send the tweet
  • Sent via Twitter for iPhone (or for Android), etc – fairly explanatory (official Twitter apps)
  • Sent via Echofon for [smartphone] – these are 3rd party apps
  • Sent via Mobile Twitter – they may have used the mobile version of desktop Twitter on their smartphone

Here’s a screenshot of this information for a tweet sent via, as seen on

Screenshot 2018-08-12 17.49.37

Because Echofon is used on a mobile device it’s reasonable to assume that if that was used to send the tweet the person was using a phone. If it says something like ‘Twitter for web’ then they may have tweeted from a desktop computer.

Limitations: On an iPhone it was possible to download the Chrome browser and use Twitter’s desktop version (ie force it to show desktop rather than the more usual mobile-friendly version). Tweets sent in this way would appear as ‘from desktop’ yet would have been sent by mobile phone. It’s a while since I’ve played with this so don’t know if it’s still the case.

4. Detect changes on another website, or new information being published
Use the change detection service and get it to send you an email if the text on a website is amended, or you can set up a Google Alert to email you if a particular word or phrase appears in a newly published page on the internet

5. How many followers did X have at point Y?
One of the considerations in the recent Monroe v Hopkins Twitter libel case considered how many followers the parties had at the time the relevant tweets were made. This was estimated but in some cases you’d be able to find the exact number thanks to the Internet Archive‘s ‘Wayback Machine‘ which periodically saves copies of web pages and stores them for future searching.

Whether or not someone’s Twitter account has been archived will probably be fairly random (and presumably new accounts won’t be included – though you can of course manually add their page to the archive, or use Freezepage as mentioned above) – I was quite pleased to find that my page has been archived. The Internet Archive takes snapshots at particular time points, often several months apart – it’s pot luck what’s there.

The Internet Archive has taken several snapshots of my Twitter account and one, made at 14:52 on 14 Feb 2010 showed that I had 820 followers, by 3 August 2014 this had increased to 3,631. My account has had 44 snapshots taken between 23 Dec 2008 and 9 Jan 2017. Use the format and insert it here to test an account’s history.

6. Fake tweets – screenshots, deletions
(i) It is possible to open the Inspector panel on a browser (on Firefox on a Mac this is Command+Alt/Option+i). If you have a tweet open while doing this you can search for the text of the tweet within the Inspector panel that appears and edit it. Clicking back in the main browser window will show a fake tweet which could then be captured with a screenshot. Of course screenshots can also be faked with (ii) Photoshop-type editing or (iii) copying the text of someone else’s tweet onto a screenshot. I don’t know how prevalent this is but I’ve seen a suspected example this evening (I don’t know which of the methods suggested above they used to create it).

I asked about (i) and received confirmation from Sean Ellis who also pointed out that you could also just (iv) download a local copy of the web page, manipulate the underlying HTML code in notepad and reload a local copy and take a screenshot. There seem to be a lot of ways of cheating!

If you add extra numbers to the end of a tweet’s URL / link you are effectively creating a tweet that has never been published. When pressing enter, to open the tweet, Twitter will return a page not found – which looks as if the person has deleted the tweet. Here’s an example I created for myself using two numbers repeated to make it clear what I did.

It looks like this on the page. The page never existed!

Screenshot 2018-08-29 23.48.59

7. Further reading

Is this Twitter follower real or a spam account?

Bad news – an awful lot of your followers aren’t real people but fake ‘bot’ (robot) followers. They follow people for a variety of reasons including hoping to get you to follow them (so that they start to look more real and valuable). You might be followed by several similar accounts in a short space of time and it takes a while to get a good sense of whether or not an account is fake.

Any of these ‘behaviours’ suggest that a follower might be fake, but remember that they’re also done by people new to Twitter – so avoid jumping to conclusions.

  • A username with a lot of alphanumeric characters – while some use this deliberately (and you’ll see that they are actively tweeting and interacting with people) mostly these are fake accounts sending out generic, identical replies.
  • An ‘egg’ for an avatar – this is the default picture on Twitter and while some have never changed this image it’s a good idea to do so.
  • Following many (especially celebrity accounts) but only followed by few – be careful, they may have just joined and begun following a lot of people before getting going. Twitter actively encourages new users to follow celebrity accounts by making them very prominent during the registration process. You can look at their profile to see when they joined though.
  • Zero tweets – but don’t forget that people can use Twitter as they please and they might just want to follow some accounts for news only and don’t want to tweet their own stuff. Spam accounts also do this though.
  • Posting the same (nearly identical) tweets as other people

You can do a reverse image search on their avatar (profile picture) and see if it’s been taken from stock photography resources, or stolen from another user and you can search for a phrase from one of their tweets and see if loads of accounts are tweeting the same thing. Similarly for links (be cautious about clicking on the link but it’s safe to search for the link).

Mostly it’s down your own judgement – you’re not required to do anything about spam accounts but reporting the obvious ones improves the Twitter ecosystem for everyone.

Further reading
Reporting spam on Twitter from Twitter Support

How did that person find me on Twitter?

Sometimes you might find that you’ve been followed or tweeted to by someone that you weren’t expecting to find you on Twitter. This can happen for several reasons:

  • they already follow other mutual friends and Twitter’s algorithms have suggested you as a possibility
  • they searched for your name or someone told them (this includes your tweet being retweeted into their timeline)
  • the email address you’ve used for Twitter is in their email contacts list and they’ve let Twitter trawl that list to find people’s matched Twitter handles – you can switch this off by making yourself less discoverable (make sure “Let others find me by my email address” is unticked)
  • you’ve added your mobile phone number to Twitter during registration (make sure “Let others find me by my phone number” is unticked too (also you can remove your phone)
  • you’ve added your Twitter info to your website

If you’ve changed your Twitter name / handle in the hope of being less findable then remember that this probably won’t work. Threaded conversations (if you click on a tweet you’ll see all its replies) will likely indicate your current name because any reply you sent previously will now be attributed to your new Twitter name.

“Although an account can change its @handle, it can never change its Twitter ID” –

Searching for a link (URL, address) on Twitter

Twitter’s search will let you find almost* all the tweets that contain a particular link. You can just plug in part of the link into search (desktop Twitter‘s best for this). To view all the tweets choose ‘live’ from the options and scroll down to go further into the past.

What have your friends said about this link?
If you want to see what people you follow have tweeted about this link you can restrict the search just to them. This can be useful if you click on a link earlier in the day, forget who sent it but want to acknowledge them in a tweet you subsequently send – you can work out from whom you saw the tweet.

Screen Shot 2015-07-18 at 00.54.36

Screen Shot 2015-07-18 at 00.54.45

A note on how to search for a link – try different bits of the address
Twitter’s search can be a bit mercurial – or, I haven’t worked out exactly what’s going on yet. Sometimes putting the entire link in yields nothing… sometimes it yields something. I generally select a bit of the link and choose a bit that’s likely to winnow out irrelevant tweets.

A note on the appearance of the link
Twitter does not distinguish among modified (shortened) links that point to the same web page, so searching will bring up a variety of different-links all going to the same place.

Example: here’s an address: and if you search for it on Twitter you’ll get these results which include these shortened versions of the URL which all point to the same page

If you want to share a link without having it show up in searches try something like (effectively it ‘cloaks’ the link by pointing to an intermediate site first).

Saving time when searching again
If you’ve just searched for apples and bananas you’ll first see all the Top tweets and then have to click ‘Live‘ to see all of them. If you decide you want to search for apples and pears you can avoid this two-step process by editing the search-result-link in the address bar (desktop Twitter only).

The first link is:

Replace bananas with pears and press ‘go’.